Disruption Defined

innovator

Like “innovation”, “disruption” is becoming a buzzword – losing the real meaning behind the original theory made famous by Clayton Christensen.

I came across an incredibly clear explanation of disruption provided by the New York Times (it’s actually from an innovation report that was leaked last week). You can read it here (Page 16). I was drawn to this description through Ezra Klein’s piece entitled “Read the New York Times’ insanely clear explanation of disruption

The key points:
1) The original disruption theory comes from Clayton Christensen’s study of things like the hard drive and steel industries where he realized that disruptive products tend to combine new technologies, cheaper production, and — crucially — worse products.
2) Poor quality and low profit margins of the new product prevent the incumbent business from recognizing the threat. (Also relates to Chris Dixon’s Good Ideas look like Bad Ideas see it here).
3) As the competitors experiment with the new production technologies they become better able to produce high-quality, high-profit products than the incumbents, and they eventually move up the value chain and disrupt the incumbent’s core business.

EMC

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: